Maternal sacrifice in literature. The image of the mother in Russian literature

Guys, we put our soul into the site. Thanks for that
for discovering this beauty. Thanks for the inspiration and goosebumps.
Join us at Facebook And In contact with

Helpful and kind people with sacrificial behavior will share the best piece of cake, rush to the rescue from the other side of the country, lend any amount. In short, they will do anything to please. At first glance, one can only dream of such parents / relatives / friends. However, people who are willing to sacrifice their comfort for you are not saints at all: they are dangerous manipulators.

website I finally decided to put everything on the shelves and understand why you need to stay away from too helpful people, and think carefully before doing good without asking.

What is a victim manipulator

Under the guise of “I spent my best years on you / invested a lot of money in you / I can’t sleep at night because of you,” manipulative victims give out their love and friendship on credit. This loan will have to be repaid for many years. In the case of children, for whom mothers sacrifice their personal lives, it is completely impossible to repay the “debt”. As planned by the manipulator, others should be grateful to them for the money, time and love given.

If you hear such phrases from your parents, partners, spouses or friends, know that they are trying to manipulate you with the help of guilt:

"I'm wasting the best years of my life on you."
“I stopped talking to my girlfriends/friends for you.”
“I didn’t get married a second time so that you didn’t have to communicate with your stepfather.”
“I spend money on you and I don’t see any gratitude.”
“I cooked this borscht for 3 hours, and you turn up your nose.”

All accusations are built according to the scheme "I sacrificed something incredibly important for you, and now it's your turn to pay." Moreover, the demonstrative sacrifice is very important for the manipulator, for which no one actually asked him (children did not ask them to give birth, husbands did not ask their wives to quit their jobs, and so on).

Sacrificial behavior is not grateful. On the contrary, the recipient has a desire to escape to the other end of the world, away from unsolicited charity.

Why are they doing that

Psychologists call such sacrifice neurotic. Unlike selfless sacrifice, which is characterized by the desire to help a person without expecting anything in return, neurotic comes from selfish motives. And that's why:

The victim is always passive-aggressive. This means that she really wants to hit someone properly, but her upbringing does not allow. Then manipulation comes to the rescue. Instead of directly expressing dissatisfaction, the mother tells her son: “I didn’t sleep at night because of you, and you got married and now you don’t call.” So the victim provokes the opponent to negative emotions, manipulates his loneliness and in the end achieves what he wants.
The victim needs praise. And all because of low self-esteem. It seems to such people that no one will love them just like that. First, the victim infringes on his interests, and then he waits to be noticed and loved. Is it necessary to say that this does not happen? In the end, everything ends with disappointment in people (“no one appreciates me”).
The victim follows a cultural tradition. This is aggressive sacrifice, or, in simple terms, "the obligation to bear one's cross." A manipulative victim will live with an alcoholic or abuser simply because "everyone lives like that." However, even from such an unhealthy union, the victim receives benefits: the sympathy of others, for example.
The victim gives what they don't have. The manipulator donates not what he has in abundance (time, money, emotional energy). He donates what he himself lacks. Sooner or later, from such negative sacrifice, depression begins and there is a feeling that no one around you understands you.

Why do overly helpful people piss us off?

Victims terribly annoy ordinary people because they expect to receive a piece of their life in return. In psychology, there is the concept of emotional blackmail. However, it works only with close people, because ordinary acquaintances do not care what happens to the blackmailer.

Psychologists and sociologists have carefully studied the behavior of the victim-manipulator and talked about the ways in which such people achieve what they want. The manipulation technique is called FOG. Here are 3 feelings the victim plays on to get what they want:

F ear (English) - fear. Fear of offending, losing or upsetting the manipulator.
O bligation (English) - responsibility. By their behavior, the manipulator appeals to your sense of duty and wants to put the blame on you for their failures or bad mood.
G uilt (English) - wine. Shame that you didn't live up to expectations.

In the UK, the law on emotional abuse and coercive control has recently been in force. This means that no one person in the world has the right to control another. According to this law, a citizen of the country will not be able to force his wife to cook dinner, should not put pressure on the children, demanding that they do their homework - you can only ask. What this practice will lead to is still unclear: it has both obvious advantages (protection against domestic violence in all its manifestations) and significant disadvantages (the inability to accurately determine the degree of guilt of the "rapist").

How to get rid of a victim

The most obvious answer to this question is to stop communicating. But what to do if parents or a spouse act as a manipulator? Psychologists say that you can try to improve your relationship. And here's how:

Don't give manipulators what they want. As soon as the conversation turns into the mainstream “I gave you everything, and you are ungrateful,” ignore such remarks and continue the conversation as if nothing had happened.
Understand that you are not responsible for someone else's happiness or unhappiness.
"You can't win - lead." If accusations of ingratitude rain down on you, start complaining back. This tactic helps to confuse the manipulator and seize the initiative in the conversation.
Finally, talk openly about your feelings with the manipulator. Find out what he really wants: maybe calling his elderly parents once a week will solve the problem of complaints.

What to do if you are the same person who is ready to sacrifice himself for the sake of family and friends

Psychologists call for finding the golden mean in relationships. You should not be selfish and not make concessions at all, but sacrificing yourself for the sake of a partner / children / friends is also not the best option.

If it seems to you that you are going out of your way for someone, but you are not appreciated at the same time, then the problem is with you, and not at all with those who do not appreciate. Leave this rotten occupation and do something for yourself.

Do you think there are people in the world who help just like that and do not expect anything in return? Or is any good deed done with a certain self-interest (to amuse one's pride, to receive a favor in return)?

What drives people who are ready to sacrifice their own lives? It is this problem that V.A. Kaverin raises in his text. This problem has been and remains relevant at the present time.

Reflecting on it, the author talks about two soldiers called to the headquarters. They were Kornev and Tumik. They were called on a very serious and important task: it was necessary to destroy the enemy's battery. The commander began his story about self-sacrifice during the war years and offered the scouts a similar option, to which both agreed. The operation began in the morning. There were a lot of shells around, so blowing up the battery was not particularly difficult, but there were a lot of people around. The day before, Tumik remembered his father, girlfriend, friend, all his life, he was ready to give his life for the Motherland! He knew that Kornev had a young wife and a small son, so he arranged the lot in such a way that in any case he would take a heroic deed.

They said goodbye, and after a while there was an explosion - the battery was destroyed.

V.A. Kaverin is deeply convinced that people are ready to sacrifice their own lives for the sake of protecting their loved ones, for the sake of protecting their Fatherland.

I absolutely agree with the writer. An unknown force gives a person strength and courage to fulfill a sacred duty - to protect his country.

The work of B. L. Vasiliev “The Dawns Here Are Quiet” can serve as confirmation of the above. During the war, not only men, but also women showed fortitude. So, five young girls responded to the duty of protecting the Motherland. They were ready to go to any difficulties and trials for the sake of saving the country. Even when the girls died in front of each other, they did not give up, but became stronger. Their exploits made a certain contribution to the victory over the enemy.

Examples of heroic self-sacrifice can appear not only in war. Are you joining in 2019? Our team will help you save your time and nerves: we will select directions and universities (according to your preferences and recommendations of experts); we will issue applications (you will only have to sign); we will apply to Russian universities (online, by e-mail, by courier); we monitor competitive lists ( we automate the tracking and analysis of your positions); we will tell you when and where to submit the original (we will evaluate the chances and determine the best option). Entrust the routine to professionals - more details.

Confirmation is the story of M. Gorky "Old Woman Izergil". According to one legend of an old woman, one strong tribe drove another from its territory into a dense forest. The poor people could not get out of it for a long time. But at one moment a young and strong young man appeared who loved people. He began to help them get out of the forest, but the crowd was disappointed by the long wanderings. Then Danko, that was the name of the hero, pulled out his fiery heart from his chest, which, illuminating the forest, led the people out of the forest. Such a heroic act was performed by a young man for the sake of other people.

In conclusion, I would like to say that the protection of our people and our Fatherland is the sacred duty of each of us. We must remember those who gave us life!

Useful material on the topic:

15.3 What is a motto? (according to the text of V. A. Kaverin)
What is self-education? according to the text of V. A. Kaverin
15.3 What is LOVE? according to the text of Kaverin
15.3 What is LOVE? according to the text of Kaverin 30 option
15.3 What is LOVE? according to the text of Kaverin 31 options

What drives people who are ready to sacrifice their own lives? (according to V.A. Kaverin “The Last Night”) (USE in Russian)

What drives people who are ready to sacrifice their own lives? It is this problem that V.A. Kaverin touches upon in the analyzed text.

To draw the reader's attention to this issue, the author tells about an incident that occurred in the war. During the halt, the main characters and the commissar thought about self-sacrifice, because they faced a difficult task: to destroy the enemy’s battery, which hindered the movement of troops, but this could only be done by sacrificing oneself. The soldiers did not hesitate for a minute: “Tumik was the first to say that he agreed.

Kornev also agreed ... ". Both of these heroes showed great strength of mind, agreeing to give their lives for the good of their homeland. They understood that they were chosen for a reason, because they were the best scouts and even managed to get several medals, and only they could complete this mission.

In addition, it was the memories of home, family, homeland that gave the soldier confidence: "Tumik" remembered his whole life, the most important thing, the most interesting thing in life. After thinking everything over before landing, the hero concluded: "It was not without reason that I lived on earth."

Both of these illustrations from the text suggest that self-sacrifice is necessary in a critical situation, when the fate of many others depends on the act of one person.

Kaverin's position regarding the problem raised becomes clear only after a meaningful reading of the text.

One cannot but agree with the author's point of view, since during the war the actions of the soldiers were aimed at the benefit of the fatherland in the name of saving their relatives and friends who remained in civilian life. For the sake of victory, people were ready for the most courageous and selfless deeds, in some situations even for self-sacrifice.

Thus, after analyzing the text, we can conclude that people who are ready for self-sacrifice are driven by love for the motherland, a sense of duty to the fatherland, and memories of home give strength and morally nourish each person.

Self-sacrifice as a way of life.

Self-sacrifice is inherent in our people. Of course, not all, but very, very many.

History testifies to this, it is enough to recall the wives of the Decembrists. In literature, a vivid example is Sonechka Marmeladova. And modern life: wives who save the husbands of alcoholics, mothers who forget about themselves for the sake of children, workaholics working for the good of the company 15 hours a day.

And we are taught from childhood that we should think first of all about loved ones, about the team, that selfishness is bad and shameful. But is it really good to live for others?

Self-sacrifice implies the rejection of one's own interests, desires, aspirations for the sake of another person. Many people think that this behavior is based on love, but this is not so. In fact, people dedicate their lives to others for two reasons: fear and self-doubt.

In the first case, a person is afraid of losing a loved one, being alone, or losing advantages: money, status, etc. Thus selfishness is the basis of self-sacrifice.

It often happens that a person considers himself a loser, unimportant, useless and uninteresting. And so he lives on the achievements and problems of other people. Thus, he seeks to achieve social recognition or the location of loved ones, to feel his importance. If there is love in this, it is only perverted love for oneself.

The desire for self-sacrifice is caused by a lack of love in childhood or upbringing: it was customary in the family to live for others, charity was encouraged to the detriment of oneself.

The biggest problem of self-sacrifice is that the person who sacrifices himself does not understand that this is only his choice, that no one owes him anything. And therefore, having received nothing in return, he begins to accuse others of ingratitude.

Self-sacrifice, if it is not a way of life, can also be disinterested: saving a comrade in a war, during a disaster, fire, etc., a mother in a critical situation sacrifices herself for the sake of a child.

Is it worth it to live for the sake of another, even a loved one, sacrificing your own interests? Or should selfishness (within reasonable limits) take place in any relationship?

What is self-sacrifice

Self-sacrifice is the voluntary sacrifice of oneself or one's own interests for the sake of others. It can be conscious (employees of the Ministry of Emergency Situations, military in combat) and unconscious (helping people in an emergency).

sacrificial, sincere desire to protect others, their own land, home. Such an intention is the result of a person's sense of patriotism, his ideals and upbringing. The individual is incapable of doing otherwise. Such individuals rush to help without hesitation, this is a spiritual impulse;
fulfillment of their own inner desires. An example is worth giving here. There are people who seek to get into "hot spots" in order to save people's lives there. But why do they need it? You might think that this is a desire to protect the Motherland. But in fact, they strive to receive medals and awards for courage in order to be proud of their loved ones.

In turn, sacrifice in the understanding of religion is a virtue, which is expressed in a sincere desire to devote oneself to others.

The problem of self-sacrifice

It is believed that the willingness to sacrifice oneself for the basis uses love. Powerful feelings make people perform feats: some devote themselves disinterestedly to their soul mate, others give themselves to their favorite work. But experts are sure that such a theory is erroneous.

The problem of self-sacrifice is the unattractiveness of the reasons that cause this desire. In life, the desire to sacrifice oneself gives rise to other feelings: fear and doubt. The latter cause a loss of a sense of strength and confidence. Such people are sure that their personality does not mean anything, they are not ready to take actions, therefore they live with the problems and achievements of another person. In addition, they are confident in personal failures, because they believe that indulgence is not available to them. The result of such an opinion is self-sacrifice. In this way, people are trying to get location, recognition.

For this reason, often the meaning of self-sacrifice is not a sincere desire to neglect one's interests, but a simple manipulation of people to achieve an internal goal. Fear in the form of the main motive of sacrifice appears because of the fear of loneliness.

There are many examples from life: children who escaped from the suffocating care of their mother forget about her; wives who refuse to realize themselves for the sake of the family find themselves alone or suffer disrespect from their husbands. From such individuals one can often hear complaints that they did everything for the sake of others, but in the end they got nothing. But they were not asked for such sacrifices, their actions are their own choice.

Conscious self-sacrifice is a person's understanding of the victim, its essence, purpose and value. A soldier, when he covers others with himself or goes to the enemy, he realizes that this will cause his death, but his actions will save others. It is this self-sacrifice that is called heroism.

Donation is not too dangerous if it belongs to the same family or group, because. its pernicious influence is not too global. But if it concerns the interests of an entire country or society, then the result will be deplorable. Often the basis of the actions of suicidal terrorists is the problem of self-sacrifice. Their arguments are based on love for the Motherland, religion.

Why is self-sacrifice dangerous?

The first thing that comes to mind when pronouncing the word “self-sacrifice” is something sublime. This is the rejection of oneself for the sake of higher goals, the sacrifice of one's own interests in the name of something more valuable. But Leo Tolstoy said that self-sacrifice is the most offensive expression of egoism. Why is it dangerous? What did Tolstoy mean?

Self-sacrifice is inherent in the Slavic people, we are not individualists. In addition, we encourage the desire to sacrifice ourselves. But it happens that self-sacrifice is a style of existence, it takes on unusual forms.

It is believed that sacrificing oneself in the name of a loved one is an indicator of good taste. We are cited as an example of the Decembrist wives, and parents are left with no choice at all - they are obliged to do everything for the sake of their children, subordinating themselves to their desires. Yes, love is not selfishness, but why should anyone suffer? Is it really necessary to sacrifice?

As already mentioned, the basis of self-sacrifice is not always love. Often its basis is fear and disbelief in one's own strength. A person is sure that he is not worthy of recognition and love, therefore he wins them. Self-sacrifice becomes an element of manipulation. A person reads himself not so good that the second half stays next to her just like that, therefore remarkable efforts are required. And the fear here is that the person for whom the sacrifice is made will leave.

But the negative is not only in this, the further the person goes in an effort to give himself away, the more terrible the story ends. There are many examples around how people do not appreciate such sacrifices. But you can't call them traitors. If another person voluntarily gave up something, then sooner or later he will hear the question why he did it, who asked him.

For these reasons, self-sacrifice is considered a manifestation of selfishness. A person behaves as he considers right, without taking into account the opinions of other people about it. But he also demands gratitude for his actions. If he doesn't get it, he feels offended. As a result, hatred arises for the one for whom the sacrifice was made, for whom it turned out to be unnecessary. A person needs to leave the right to choose whether he needs this sacrifice or not, to refuse it or to accept it.

But what about altruism, self-denial? Self-sacrifice, of course, has the right to exist. After all, everyone decides what to do and how to behave. The main thing is not to wait for recognition for your own actions, then you will not take actions aimed at satisfying internal needs at the expense of others.

There is a fairly common notion that self-sacrifice for the good of others is extremely valuable. Often, parents are even proud of the fact that they had to give up a lot for the sake of their children. “If it wasn’t for you, then your dad and I would have divorced a long time ago, I would have received a higher education, I would have advanced in my career, etc.” - such phrases are not often heard by children. Moreover, self-sacrifice is socially reinforced: this is considered a very noble deed, and those who sacrifice themselves serve as a role model for others.

I propose to consider in more depth the pros and cons of such behavior. May seem cruel, but self-sacrifice of parents for the good of the children not always positive. Oddly enough, it can, on the contrary, lead to the formation of a destructive position in children. Why? If you think about it, then in the words of the parents "if not you…" a hidden message is unwittingly transmitted, which is considered the most life-threatening. At their core, the following is implied: "If you die, then it will become easier for me." The message “if not for you…” lays an unconscious program in the child so that he disappears as soon as possible to make life easier for his parents.

There is one more subtlety. Taking a position of self-sacrifice, parents almost never ask the child about her need for him. It turns out that parents do what they want, dressing him in the mask of "self-sacrifice". As an example, I will give a fragment of the consultation. One day an old woman came to me. She began to talk about her son with tears in her eyes. All her life she took care of him, after school she got a job at an institute in another city. Six months later, it turned out that he did not study there, and even owed a huge amount of money. In order to save him, she had to sell the apartment. Her question was: “What should I do with it, how can I change it?” At first I tried to turn the conversation to herself: why is she so worried about how she should live her life, and not the life of her son. According to my rules, you need to work with those who came. But the woman seemed not to hear me and continued to talk not about herself, but about her son.

I realized that in order to get her out of her depression, shock therapy was needed: “Your situation is a dead end. I don't think I can help you." The words had a sobering effect. Finally she heard me. "Why?" she asked. “On the one hand, you are unlikely to be able to re-educate your son at that age. On the other hand, you will continue to deal with his affairs. Is not it?" She confirmed my words and asked: “But maybe something can be done?” “To do this, you need to somehow ease the load. But you don't leave him. This means that there is only one way out. To make it easier for you, it is necessary that he ... die. Then you will stop suffering." The woman was frightened at first, then thought about it and said: “Yes, and my son keeps telling me that he is thinking about suicide. Even some kind of pistol threatened to get.

Indeed, in donor's position Always there is hidden aggression to another person, because it is he who is the cause of his deprivation. And this subconscious aggression is transmitted, but it is difficult to defend against it - he sacrifices for me! No child wants to be happy at the expense of their parents' suffering. He loves mom and dad and is ready for a lot for them. Children's logic is very simple: if the mother suffers because of me, then in order for her to feel better, she must die. So the sacrificial position forms a destructive self-destructive position in the other person. And children love their parents, subtly feel their hidden signals, and for the sake of this love they are ready to go even to death. Therefore, to alleviate the parental fate, they may form a life scenario, based on the desire to quickly disappear from life. There are plenty of means to implement it: alcohol, drugs, injuries, etc. If you look at the child-parent relationship of such latent suicides, you can often find that the child was considered by one of the parents as an obstacle to his personal life.

Such a deep meaning and harm of self-sacrifice concerns not only the relationship between parents and children, but also other human relationships. Therefore, self-sacrifice can be viewed as a form of subtle manipulation: we, while suffering, increase our self-esteem, and the one for whom this is supposedly done is overloaded with guilt. With self-sacrifice, a person does not act as a taker, but a giver, however, all his “gifts” have a common feature: the “giver” under the guise of love satisfies his own needs. It does not take into account the development needs of the "recipient", what would be useful and contribute to its growth and development. It turns out that self-sacrifice is often harmful both for the “donor” himself and for his ward.

For the most part, doing evil to people is not as dangerous as doing them too much good.

F. de La Rochefoucauld

Trap 28. You are no longer my daughter (not son)!

Sometimes parents, for educational or other purposes, use such a seemingly terrible statement: “If you behave like this, then you are no longer my daughter (not son)!” For example, one woman with tears in her eyes recalled how, as a child, during a conflict, her mother told her: “I am not your mother. Your mother sells seeds in the market!” Despite the sincerity of the speakers, this phrase is nonsense. You should not be afraid of such words at all, our fears are absolutely groundless.

Since the category "native" Unlike "foreign" is constant, then with relatives it is impossible to change the status of relations. Relationships do not depend on actions, their status is determined biologically, that is, “by blood”. No matter how a daughter or son behaves, they still remain relatives. In relation to our relatives, we will always be relatives. It is a fact. The situation is quite different in relations with a stranger. He can be a friend, a husband, a boss, and all this can change. You can quarrel with a friend, divorce your husband, quit your boss or, moving up the career ladder, become his leader.

Sometimes the confusion between the categories "strangers - relatives" leads to the idea that in order to avoid rejection, one must strive to be good. Fear of rejection on the part of the parent provokes the desire to be a "good daughter" or "real son." This is also a mistake. Natural given cannot be assessed, only something can be assessed done or artificial. Can I tell if the tree I see from the window is good or bad? It is what it is, it could not be otherwise. It grew up in such a place, in such a climate, in such light. But if I made, for example, a stool, then it can be assessed whether it is good or bad. A husband or wife, a subordinate or a boss can be bad, as these are social roles, and, as a result, they can be assessed. And there are no bad relatives! No matter how the child behaves, he will forever remain a son or daughter. If we try to be "good" sons or parents, brothers or sisters, then such behavior only increases our alienation from each other.

In the case of mixing the statuses of parent and child, they are replaced by the roles of superior and subordinate. As one girl said: “If I don’t obey my dad, he won’t give me money.” I asked her a question: “How is the role of a daughter different from the role of a subordinate?” On the move, she could not find the differences, she said that they were one and the same. I suggested that at least in theory there should be a difference. We began to think together. If a person is in the role of a subordinate, then he works for a salary, accordingly, there can be no frankness with the boss, you have to use all sorts of tricks and manipulations to save your job. Then she asked: “But how to remain a daughter, and not a subordinate?” The only thing I could then answer: "Do something for dad for free, without benefit for yourself." It helped her.

Another case in my practice on the same topic. The young girl had a strong attachment to her parents. She applied immediately with two problems - it is difficult for her to get a job and she cannot get married. While she works with her mother and with a small salary. During the discussion, it turned out that these problems are not so far from each other. Here is an excerpt from our conversation:

Mom came last night and asked me: “Who can I ask to wash the dishes?” I replied that there are four of us at home, whomever he wants to ask, let him turn to him. Mom was offended and went to wash the dishes herself. I approached and asked her why she didn't directly express her desire to offer to help me. But she only pursed her lips. I felt very unpleasant from this, as if I had done something wrong, turned out to be disobedient. And this happens often, I would like to change something in this.

So you don't want to be an obedient child anymore. And what gives the role of an obedient child? I asked.

“Love and… money.

- And the daughter is a profession? What is the difference between a daughter and an employee?

- Probably not much difference. Often parents take their children to work. Well, the difference is probably that the employee consciously thinks about the salary, and the daughter unconsciously.

- Then another question: do your parents in the family pay you as a daughter or as a “good” daughter?

“Of course, they won’t give you money that easily!” she answered with a laugh. Then she added: “In general, I was always scared that I would have to start working. I was very afraid that at one moment my parents would say - that's it, go earn it yourself.

I decided that it is already possible to move on to some interpretation:

“Perhaps the core of the problem is that you do not share the roles of worker and daughter. Because of this, there is a problem of employment. Since you already have a job - "good daughter." And the salary, as I understand it, is not bad. New jobs don't pay that much. Of course, in such a situation, you don’t want to look for another job at all. But this combination of work and family relationships creates a neurotic relationship, since there is no such profession as a “good daughter”. There are differences, and they are significant. If an employee can be fired for bad work, then a daughter is for life. Therefore, there are no bad or good daughters. It is a mistake to assume that a bad daughter is one that does not live up to the expectations of her parents. You are given money not for the fact that you live up to parental expectations, but for the fact that you are your own daughter. Unlike salaries, they are given just like that, and not for work.

“But it happens that parents abandon their children,” she objected.

- Happens. Well, so what? No matter how they refuse, you still remain a daughter.

When a parent rejects a son or daughter, the latter should accept life from them into their hearts, and then let them go forever.

Parental heroism is a mode of action inherent in every earthly being who has a child. He sits deep inside, and is shown when the threat to life for his own child reaches its climax.

Thus, the famous Soviet writer V.A. Soloukhin raises the problem of parental self-sacrifice for the sake of their children.

Speaking about the fearlessness of parents in the face of death, V.A. Soloukhin recalls two incidents from his life. The first is with a muskrat that kept literally two meters away from the writer in order to be able to save her cubs, which is absolutely amazing for such an animal, because they are afraid of people. However, the fear of her own death, for this small animal, was not as great as the fear of the death of her children, and therefore, she stayed on the water for a long time, waiting for the writer to move away from the hole in which her children were.

The second case concerns Soloukhin himself, who, returning home from the river, began to think about what a disaster for a person is comparable in scale to the disaster of a muskrat. And he came to one conclusion: "its name is war." Because if it had begun, then Soloukhin, like a father, just like a desman, would begin to rush about and come up with different ways to save his children, sacrificing his own life, but doing everything in order to fulfill his plan.

Citing these examples, it becomes clear that Soloukhin has a strong feeling of love for his children and understanding for other parents.

I fully agree with the position of the author. The death of a person close to us, such as a mother or father, is, in general, the worst thing that can happen to us. But when one's own child dies, it becomes a loss that one cannot actually survive, because everything in nature must go on as usual, and if the death of someone older, clear and understandable, even though it is difficult to accept, then the death of someone who has lived less than us, for the human mind - is incomprehensible, and that is why the parents, who have invested all their love in us, are trying to do everything so that this does not happen.

Summing up, the author talks about the planes flying in the sky that were created from fire and metal, he talks about the planes that will be used in case there is a war. And for those who sit in them, it doesn’t matter either to the muskrat cubs or to his children, however, they will take care of their own. That is why it is very important to remember that we are all surrounded by creatures whose life no one has the right to take away.

Mother's love is the purest, not dependent on any circumstances. It is the mother who will always understand, accept any choice of the child, because the main thing for her is the happiness of her beloved child. If a person in the family happens just like that, then he can be considered the happiest.

Many writers and poets sang of maternal love in their works. These literary examples for writing-reasoning on the OGE in the Russian language, the Wise Litrecon, were pleased to select for you. But if you missed some specific argument, then write to us in the comments what you need to add.

In the story of N. V. Gogol "Taras Bulba" maternal love is shown on the example of the wife of the protagonist, the stern Cossack Taras. The heroine put all her love, tenderness and passion into feeling for her sons Ostap and Andriy. Marriage did not bring her happiness: she saw only anger and beatings from her husband. But the children for her always remained the light in the window. They were rarely seen, as the sons studied away from home. But when the mother met with the children, she did everything for their comfort, she could not see enough of them. She was not even afraid to stand up for her sons before their father, who sent them to fight. And on their last night at home, the inconsolable mother admired the sleeping Ostap and Andriy until morning. Her love for offspring is evidence that the heart of a mother beats for the sake of her children.
Mother's love is vividly shown in the story of L. N. Tolstoy "Childhood" in the image of Natalya Nikolaevna, Nikolenka's mother. The woman was distinguished by meekness and kindness, she was considered a real angel. She loved her husband, but he deceived and ruined her. Natalya Nikolaevna did not hide her love for children, she was not ashamed to caress them and talk to them (although such attention to offspring was not common among the nobility). Yes, the mother did not spend too much time with the children, but they all felt her love and care, they communicated with her every day. The death of Natalya Nikolaevna was a terrible blow for everyone, especially for Nikolenka. Children especially strongly feel the love of their mother, so it is very difficult for them to lose it.
Blind and reckless maternal love is shown in the comedy by D. I. Fonvizin "Undergrowth". The landowner Prostakova loved only her son Mitrofan, indulged him, surrounded him with care (sometimes excessive). The woman did everything for the sake of her overage child, not even noticing that excessive care makes him ungrateful and lazy. Mitrofan himself took maternal love for granted, for him there were only his own interests, and his mother was only their executor. Therefore, the son abandoned the parent at a difficult moment, when she ceased to be powerful. Unfortunately, not all people can appreciate maternal love at its true worth.
The theme of mother's love is given attention and in the story of N. M. Karamzin "Poor Lisa". The main character lived with her old mother, who was her only relative. The elderly peasant woman loved her husband and daughter very much, and the loss of her lover made Liza the last hope for her mother. Therefore, despite the great love for Erast, sweeping away everything in its path, the girl took care of her parent, tried to protect her from the passions of her own life, even before suicide, she thought about how to soften this act for her mother. However, with the death of her daughter for an elderly woman, the meaning of life dried up, she also died. Thus, the essence of a mother's being is the life of her child, which is why it is so difficult for women to survive the death of their children.
A mother's love always manifests itself in different ways. A. N. Ostrovsky in the drama "Dowry" showed the unusual maternal love of Kharita Ignatievna Ogudalova for her daughter Larisa. The Ogudalovs are poor, there is only one chance to get out of poverty - the successful marriage of Larisa. This is the reason that Harita Ignatievna is trying in every possible way to promote her daughter in order to arrange her personal life: she arranges evenings to which she invites wealthy people, asks the closest rich people for money for maintenance, makes Larisa communicate with unpleasant "high" society. Harita Ignatievna sees happiness and success in this, she wishes her daughter well, she only does it in her own way, with an emphasis on material well-being.
In the novel by F. M. Dostoevsky "Crime and Punishment" Pulcheria Alexandrovna, mother of Rodion Raskolnikov, shows an example of the highest maternal love. She sees only the best in her son, puts all her hopes on him. For his education and living in St. Petersburg, his mother is ready to give all her savings. Pulcheria Alexandrovna does everything for the sake of the heir, and he appreciates this love and care, to be ashamed of such a high honor for him, the murderer. When Rodion began to be tried for a crime, the inconsolable mother went crazy, and then died, because she could not endure the suffering of her son. This example demonstrates the inseparable connection between a mother and her child: when a misfortune occurs in a child's life, his mother experiences it more acutely than he does.
Countess of Rostov , the heroine of the novel by L. N. Tolstov "War and Peace", represents the absolute image of the mother. Her motherhood is the main characteristic of her personality, for the sake of her family and children she is ready for anything, even for meanness (she does not want to give carts for the wounded in order to save property for the children, she prevents the love of Sonya and Nikolai, because the girl is poor). The loss of a child for her is the main tragedy in her life, because after the death of her son Petya, she almost died herself. For her children, Rostova is the main protector and adviser, she will do everything possible for them, for which she is loved and appreciated. This speaks of the generosity and power of maternal love, all-consuming and all-forgiving.
Ilyinichna, heroine novel by M. A. Sholokhov "Quiet Flows the Don" She has invested her whole life in her children. She married a beautiful and flourishing girl, and then the beatings and betrayals of her husband began. But how to leave, because they have a family, you can’t deprive the children of their father. A woman endured everything, just to put the children on their feet, to raise them as worthy people. During the revolutionary events, which Ilyinichna did not want to understand, she was on the side of those who could protect her family. The civil war took away the son of Peter, and the life of his son Gregory broke. Ilyinichna died away, grief and longing for Grigory consumed her, so she did not wait for him from the war. This example shows that the mother's heart is very sensitive to the troubles and joys of children.
Katerina Petrovna, heroine story by K. G. Paustovsky "Telegram", lived alone, she was fed only by hopes for the happiness of her daughter Nastya. Her mother did not want to interfere with her, she rarely wrote, but she constantly thought about Nastya, who lived and worked in Leningrad. The daughter had no time even to read her mother's letter, she was busy with work, not knowing that at that time Katerina Petrovna was dying. But the elderly woman left for another world without reproaches against the inattentive child, it was happiness for her to receive at least a short message from Nastya, and then die quietly. And so it happened. The image of a meek and kind mother arouses the reader's greatest respect. Looking at the heroine, we know the full power of maternal love.
The image of mother's love is shown L. Ulitskaya in the story "Daughter of Bukhara". Oriental beauty Alya gave birth to a daughter with Down syndrome, then it was a completely unfamiliar and incomprehensible diagnosis, it was clear that little Milochka would never be an ordinary child. Ali's husband could not stand this circumstance, he left her alone with the child. But the mother did everything to adapt her daughter to life, to teach her to live independently. The woman fell ill with a fatal disease, she knew that her days were numbered, but she thought not about herself, but about Milochka. The mother got her daughter a job, married her off, and then simply left to die in order to protect her child from suffering. Only maternal love is capable of such supreme self-sacrifice.